RAPID ACCESS TO THE LATEST REGIONAL CROP PEST AND DISEASE LEVELS
HGCA logo
CropMonitor > Winter Barley > National Surveys > 2005 Overview  


RHYNCHOSPORIUM  LEVELS  DECREASE  AGAIN  IN  WINTER  BARLEY
 
Latest results from the Defra funded CropMonitor project indicate the benefit that cultivar resistance can contribute to reducing disease pressures in winter barley.

CropMonitor has found that the severity of rhynchosporium leaf blotch in commercially managed winter barley was the lowest recorded since 1995, with levels in 2005 less than half those recorded in 2004. This continues the gradual decline in severity evident since 2000. Net blotch levels were the same as in 2004, which is higher than in any year since 2000 but still well below the 10-year average. Strobilurin fungicides, which are used widely by industry, can achieve good control of this disease. A contributory factor to current disease patterns may be the increased use of the cultivar Pearl, which accounted for 50% of fields surveyed. HGCA Recommended List ratings show that this cultivar has good resistance to rhynchosporium but is more susceptible to net blotch.

Levels of powdery mildew declined compared to 2004 and do not suggest that resistance to strobilurin fungicides is impacting on the industry's ability to control this disease. However, the dominance of Pearl, which has good resistance to powdery mildew will have helped to reduce disease pressures.

Levels of eyespot were the highest since 2000 but were below the 10-year average.
 
Table 1: National foliar and stem base diasese levels (GS 71-73)
  Disease 10-year mean
(1995-2004)
2003 2004 2005 *
  Powdery mildew 0.7 0.4 0.7 0.4
  Brown rust 1.0 0.3 0.2 0.2
  Rhynchosporium 2.8 2.7 1.6 0.7
  Net blotch 1.6 0.2 0.8 0.8
  Eyespot 7.1 2.8 3.2 5.5
Foliar diseases - percentage area of leaf 2 affected
Stem base diseases - percentage stems with moderate or severe lesions

* - provisional

 
Defra Logo delivered to the industry by HGCA
This website was last updated on: 07/08/2008     © Crown Copyright Central Science Laboratory 2007
CSL Logo
All risk predictions published by CropMonitor are provided in good faith and are NOT a substitute for rigorous fieldwalking in combination with advice from BASIS qualified persons. CropMonitor accepts no liability for crop loss or damage resulting from the use of CropMonitor.