RAPID ACCESS TO THE LATEST REGIONAL CROP PEST AND DISEASE LEVELS
HGCA logo
CropMonitor > Winter Wheat > Encyclopaedia > Fusarium Head Blight > Effect of fungicides on symptoms  


EFFECT OF FUNGICIDE ON FHB SYMPTOMS
 
Currently, there is no one fungicide on the market capable of giving 100% control of FHB.

To date the best control achieved is between 60 and 70%. However to achieve this level of control the fungicide needs to be applied at the correct time.
  • Optimal fungicide timing = five days pre or post inoculum arriving on the ear

This can be difficult to achieve and as a result fungicides should be used only as part of an integrated management program.

As part of a three-year project funded by the HGCA (Project Report No. 297), several trials have been carried out at CSL to investigate the effectiveness of fungicides against FHB. Unless otherwise stated the results presented are from CSL trials.

The trials were carried out on plots artificially inoculated with a mixed conidial suspension containing F. culmorum, F. graminearum, F. avenaceum, F. poae and M. nivale vars nivale and majus. Plot humidity was maintained at a level greater than 70% for five days following inoculation.

Visual assessments were carried out at GS73 and GS85. The results from the GS85 assessments are shown for 1999 to 2001.

 
1999
The effect of a range of fungicides, applied at full rate was investigated. All fungicides were applied two days post inoculation.

Fungicides applied were difenoconazole (as �Plover� at 0.3l/ha), kresoxim-methyl + epoxiconazole (as �Landmark� at 1 l/ha), metconazole (as �Caramba� at 1.5 l/ha), carbendazim (as �Derosal WDG� at 400 g/ha), azoxystrobin (as �Amistar� at 1 l/ha), tebuconazole (as �Folicur� at 1 l/ha) and prochloraz (as �Sportak� at 0.9 l/ha).



  • All the treatments applied reduced levels of disease compared to the untreated controls

  • Greatest reductions were seen with application of tebuconazole, carbendazim, kresoxim-methyl + epoxiconazole and metconazole.


2000
The effects of fungicide rate and fungicide mixtures on FHB were investigated. All fungicides were applied two days post inoculation.

Fungicides applied were tebuconazole (as �Folicur� at 1 l/ha and 0.5l/ha), metconazole (as �Caramba� at 1.5 l/ha and 0.75 l/ha), azoxystrobin (as �Amistar� at 1 l/ha and 0.5 l/ha), kresoxim-methyl + epoxiconazole (as �Landmark� at1 l/ha), epoxiconazole (as �Opus� at 1 l/ha and 0.5 l/ha), tebuconazole + azoxystrobin (as �Folicur� and �Amistar� both at 0.5 l/ha), metconazole + azoxystrobin (as �Caramba� and �Amistar� at 0.75 l/ha and 0.5 l/ha respectively), and epoxiconazole + azoxystrobin (as �Opus� and �Amistar� both at 0.5 l/ha).

graph

  • All fungicide treatments reduced the level of disease compared to the control.

  • Tebuconazole and metconazole applied at full rate were the most effective treatments.

  • In general, the use of a full rate straight formulation gave greater control than the half rate straight formulation.

  • In general, where a half rate triazole was applied in mixture with a half rate strobilurin the control achieved was equivalent to that of the half rate triazole used alone.

 
2001
The effect of fungicide rate and application timing on HB symptoms was investigated. Fungicides were applied to plots either 2 days pre -inoculation (S1) or 2 days post inoculation (S2). Levels of inoculum used to artificially infect the plots were reduced compared to previous years in order to achieve disease levels comparable to a natural infection.

Fungicides applied were tebuconazole (as 'Folicur' at 0.5 l/ha and 0.25 l/ha), azoxystrobin (as 'Amistar' at 0.5 l/ha and 0.25 l/ha) and tebuconazole + azoxystrobin (as 'Folicur' and 'Amistar' both at 0.5 l/ha and 0.25 l/ha).

graph

  • Disease levels on control plots were much lower than in previous years (5.5 % compared to circa 30 %).

  • All fungicide treatments, with the exception of the post-inoculation azoxystrobin (0.25 l/ha) treatment, significantly reduced the level of disease compared to the control plots. No other significant differences were seen.

  • In general the higher the fungicide application rate the greater the control achieved. No difference in degree of control of symptoms was seen between the two fungicide application times.

  • Reducing the level of inoculum applied to the ear reduced the differences in fungicide efficacy seen in previous years.
 
Return to FHB Index page

 
Defra Logo delivered to the industry by HGCA
This website was last updated on: 18/11/2008     © Crown Copyright Central Science Laboratory 2007
CSL Logo
All risk predictions published by CropMonitor are provided in good faith and are NOT a substitute for rigorous fieldwalking in combination with advice from BASIS qualified persons. CropMonitor accepts no liability for crop loss or damage resulting from the use of CropMonitor.